Agency: | San Antonio Water System |
---|---|
State: | Federal |
Type of Government: | State & Local |
NAICS Category: |
|
Posted Date: | Jan 5, 2024 |
Due Date: | Feb 23, 2024 |
Solicitation No: | PS-00166-RL |
Bid Source: | Please Login to View Page |
Contact information: | Please Login to View Page |
Bid Documents: | Please Login to View Page |
SOLICITATION NO: PS-00166
RELEASE DATE: January 5, 2024
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
WATER RESOURCES HYDROLOGIC CONSULTANT SERVICES
Deadline: February 23, 2024 at 2:00 p.m. (CST)
**ELECTRONIC SUBMISSIONS ONLY**
A. Objective
The San Antonio Water System (SAWS) is requesting Statements of Qualification (SOQs) from qualified groundwater consulting / engineering firms (Respondent) to provide water resources planning and engineering services to support SAWS’ water resource projects. Services shall include, but are not limited to groundwater modeling, engineering design, construction oversight, testing, reporting and hydrogeological tasks as further detailed in the Scope of Service in this Request for Qualifications (RFQ). The selected firm will perform the outlined services in this RFQ, on a work order (WO) and as-needed basis.
Full RFQ Proposal
Note: You will be prompted to login to access the full proposal document. |
|
Questions? Please contact
Roxanne Lockhart
at 210-233-3095
|
Receive Email Updates
|
Registration Agreement
Evaluation Criteria Forms
Team Experience and Qualifications
When filling out the form below, use only the space provided in this form, unless otherwise indicated. If all fields are not completed, the Respondent is at risk for being rejected due to non-responsiveness. It is not acceptable to indicate “see attached” on this form.
Using the table, describe the role of the Respondent and the proposed Subconsultants for the Project.
Respondent’s and Proposed (e.g., treatment process, hydraulic modeling, electrical engineering, I&C engineering, structural engineering, mechanical engineering, site/civil engineering, demolition, permitting, constructability, cost estimating, etc.) |
Respondent |
Sub 1: |
Sub 2: |
Sub 3: |
Sub 4: |
Sub 5: |
Sub 6: |
Sub 7: |
Sub 8: |
Evaluation Criteria Forms
(continued)
Team Experience and Qualifications
When filling out the form below, use only the space provided in this form, unless otherwise indicated. If all fields are not completed, the Respondent is at risk for being rejected due to non-responsiveness. It is not acceptable to indicate “see attached” on this form.
Using the table below, provide geographic location, percent of time committed to the Project for the duration of the Project, and years of experience in the key role, of Respondent’s Key Personnel, as well as Key Personnel from Key Subconsultants.
Proposed Key Personnel |
Geographic |
% Time |
Years of |
Evaluation Criteria Forms
(continued)
Similar Projects and Past Performance
When filling out the forms below, use only the space provided in this form, unless otherwise indicated. If all fields are not completed, the Respondent is at risk for being rejected due to non-responsiveness. It is not acceptable to indicate “see attached” on this form.
Provide detailed information for the three (3) relevant projects similar in complexity, size, and cost to the Project in this RFQ that have been completed in the last fifteen (15) years in which Respondent has performed services similar to those sought in this RFQ. A minimum of two (2) of the three (3) projects shall be/have been performed by the Respondent. A maximum of one (1) of the three (3) projects may have been performed by Key Subconsultant (or by Respondent if no Key Subconsultant is proposed).
Project No. 1 Name: |
|
Project Performed by Respondent or Key Subconsultant: |
|
Utility Owner (Name, City, and State) |
|
Utility Representative Name, Title, and Current Contact Information (Phone and Email) |
John Doe, Engineering Manager (XXX) XXX-XXXX John.Doe@XXXXX.org |
Design Contract NTP |
|
Design Duration in Months (from Contract Award to Award of Construction Contract) |
|
Construction Contract NTP |
|
Construction Duration in Months (from NTP to Final Completion) |
|
Construction Contract Value |
|
Detailed Project Description |
|
Provide an explanation for how this project is similar to the Project within this RFQ |
|
Key Personnel (to include Personnel Titles and Specific Project Tasks) |
|
Total Number of Change Orders and Number of Owner-requested Change Orders |
Evaluation Criteria Forms
(continued)
Similar Projects and Past Performance
Project No. 2 Name: |
|
Project Performed by Respondent or Key Subconsultant: |
|
Utility Owner (Name, City, and State) |
|
Utility Representative Name, Title, and Current Contact Information (Phone and Email) |
John Doe, Engineering Manager (XXX) XXX-XXXX John.Doe@XXXXX.org |
Design Contract NTP |
|
Design Duration in Months (from Contract Award to Award of Construction Contract) |
|
Construction Contract NTP |
|
Construction Duration in Months (from NTP to Final Completion) |
|
Construction Contract Value |
|
Detailed Project Description |
|
Provide an explanation for how this project is similar to the Project within this RFQ |
|
Key Personnel (to include Personnel Titles and Specific Project Tasks) |
|
Total Number of Change Orders and Number of Owner-requested Change Orders |
Evaluation Criteria Forms
(continued)
Similar Projects and Past Performance
Project No. 3 Name: |
|
Project Performed by Respondent or Key Subconsultant: |
|
Utility Owner (Name, City, and State) |
|
Utility Representative Name, Title, and Current Contact Information (Phone and Email) |
John Doe, Engineering Manager (XXX) XXX-XXXX John.Doe@XXXXX.org |
Design Contract NTP |
|
Design Duration in Months (from Contract Award to Award of Construction Contract) |
|
Construction Contract NTP |
|
Construction Duration in Months (from NTP to Final Completion) |
|
Construction Contract Value |
|
Detailed Project Description |
|
Provide an explanation for how this project is similar to the Project within this RFQ |
|
Key Personnel (to include Personnel Titles and Specific Project Tasks) |
|
Total Number of Change Orders and Number of Owner-requested Change Orders |
Evaluation Criteria Forms
(continued)
Similar Projects and Past Performance
OPCC Table
Using the table below, provide cost information for the three (3) projects submitted as part of Similar Projects and Past Performance section of the Evaluation Criteria Details and Requirements, as it relates to the accuracy of the OPCC, comparing the Engineer’s 100% Design/Bid estimate to approved construction contract awards.
Project Name |
Final |
Low Responsible |
% Difference |
Number |
Average of All |
Total Value |
Change Orders |
Project 1 |
$ |
$ |
% |
# |
$ |
$ |
% |
Project 2 |
$ |
$ |
% |
# |
$ |
$ |
% |
Project 3 |
$ |
$ |
% |
# |
$ |
$ |
% |
With Free Trial, you can:
You will have a full access to bids, website, and receive daily bid report via email and web.
RFP 24-011 Temporary Staffing Services The Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments is inviting
Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments.
Bid Due: 5/08/2024
DCHA RFP 0031-2024 TEMPORARY EMPLOYEE STAFFING SERVICES - AGENCY WIDE
District of Columbia Housing Authority
Bid Due: 5/22/2024
Follow Q402--Nursing Home Services | VISN 8 Open and Continuous Solicitation Active Contract
Federal Agency
Bid Due: 7/14/2024
Follow Q402-Community Nursing Homes - Memphis, TN catchment Active Contract Opportunity Notice ID
Federal Agency
Bid Due: 2/04/2025