RFQ 484-070926 SigOps Traffic Signal Operations Program

Date Posted: 6/3/2026
Request for Qualifications
To Provide
SigOps Traffic Signal Operations Program:
Contract 1 - North Region including District 1 - Gainesville (except Gwinnett
County) and District 6 - Cartersville
Contract 2 - Southwest Region including District 3 - Thomaston
and District 4 - Tifton
Contract 3 - Southeast Region including District 2 - Tennille
and District 5 - Jesup
RFQ 484-070926
Qualifications Due: July 9, 2026
Georgia Department of Transportation
One Georgia Center
600 West Peachtree Street, NW
Atlanta, Georgia 30308
5-2026 IDIQ MC v2

Date Posted: 6/3/2026
REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS
Each Statement of Qualification (SOQ) submittal will require one (1) Contract Consideration Checklist sheet
similar to the last page of this RFQ, indicating ALL the contract(s) a firm has submitted. This form is to ensure
all SOQs submitted are accounted for and included in the correct Contract evaluation package.
Contract # Region District(s) Project Description
1 North 1 & 6 North Region including District 1 - Gainesville (except Gwinnett
Region County) and District 6 - Cartersville
2 Southwest 3 & 4 Southwest Region including District 3 - Thomaston and District 4 -
Region Tifton
3 Southeast 2 & 5 Southeast Region including District 2 - Tennille and District 5 - Jesup
Region
I. General Project Information
A. Overview
The Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) is soliciting Statements of Qualifications (SOQs)
from a qualified firm(s) to provide Consultant Services for the projects listed above:
This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) seeks to identify potential providers for the Scope of Services for
the project/contract listed in the Exhibit(s). Firms that respond to this RFQ and are determined by
GDOT to be sufficiently qualified may be deemed eligible and invited to offer a technical approach
and/or possibly present and/or interview for these services. All respondents to this RFQ are subject to
the instructions communicated in this document and are cautioned to completely review the entire RFQ
and follow instructions carefully.
GDOT reserves the right to reject any or all Statements of Qualifications and Technical Approach, and
to waive technicalities and informalities at the discretion of GDOT.
B. Restriction of Communications
From the date of advertisement of this solicitation until the successful respondents are selected and
the award is officially announced, all firms are strictly prohibited from communicating in any way
regarding this solicitation or the associated scope of work with any GDOT staff, including the
Commissioner and GDOT Board Members. This restriction applies to all potential respondents and will
be strictly enforced.
The only exception to this restriction is for the purpose of obtaining a Consultant Evaluation Form to
support a project being included in the SOQ submittal.
All questions or requests for clarification regarding any aspect of this RFQ must be submitted in writing
via email to:
Temekia Arnold
TeArnold@dot.ga.gov
Deadlines for the submission of questions are listed in the Schedule of Events section of this RFQ.
Method of Communication
All general communication regarding this solicitation, including updates, clarifications, and official
announcements, will be posted to the Georgia Procurement Registry (GPR) under this RFQ. It is the
responsibility of all interested firms to monitor the GPR regularly for such information.
GDOT reserves the right to communicate directly via electronic mail with the primary contact listed in
the submitted Statement of Qualifications (SOQ). Additional communications may be conducted as
2

Date Posted: 6/3/2026
specified elsewhere in this RFQ.
C. Contract Term and Type
GDOT anticipates three (3) On-Call Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity Contracts to be awarded to
three (3) firms, for the project/contract identified in the Exhibit(s). GDOT anticipates that the Payment
Type may be Lump Sum, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, Cost per Unit of Work, or Specific Rate of
Compensation. As an On-Call Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity contract, the Agreements will
remain in effect for up to a maximum of five (5) years.
D. Contract Amount
The On-Call, Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity contracts will have a minimum dollar amount of
twenty-five thousand ($25,000.00) and a maximum dollar amount of Thirty Million Dollars
($30,000,000.00) Each.
E. Scope of Services
Under the terms of the resulting Agreements, the selected consultants will provide the anticipated
scope of work for each project as outlined in the accompanying Exhibit(s) referenced herein.
F. Schedule of Events
The following Schedule of Events represents GDOT's best estimate of the Schedule that will be
followed. All times indicated are prevailing times in Atlanta, Georgia. GDOT reserves the right to
adjust the Schedule as GDOT deems necessary.
PHASE I DATE TIME
a. GDOT issues a public advertisement for this RFQ. 06/03/2026 --------
b. Deadline for submission of written questions and requests for
06/17/2026 2:00 PM
clarification
c. Deadline for submission of SOQs
07/09/2026 2:00 PM
II. Selection Method
A. Phase I - Selection of Finalists
Based on the SOQs submitted in response to the projects/contracts listed in the Exhibit(s) below,
individual Selection Committee members will evaluate all firms individually based on the Phase I
selection criteria and weights listed in the solicitation. All firms will be discussed and evaluated by the
selection committee as a group and assigned a group rating for each of the Phase I evaluation criteria
and weights, resulting in a group score for Phase I, and the final rankings of the top submittals will be
determined. From the group scores of the top submittals, at least three (3) or more of the most highly
qualified consultants will be shortlisted for additional evaluation.
B. Finalist Notification
Each finalist firm shall be notified by email to participate in Phase II of the evaluation process and
informed of all due dates, additional details, and requirements beyond those provided in the solicitation.
C. Phase II - Evaluation of Final Selection
Based on the Phase II response from the finalist firms, the selection committee members will evaluate
and discuss each finalist firm's submittal based on the Phase II selection criteria and weights listed in
3

Date Posted: 6/3/2026
the solicitation and assign a group rating resulting in a group score for Phase II.
D. Final Selection
The Final selection will be determined by carrying the selection committee group scores from Phase I
forward and adding them to the results for Phase II selection committee group scores, together for a
total score. The finalists will be ranked in order of preference. At least three firms will be identified as
the most highly qualified to perform the services listed in the Exhibit(s). Note that there may be separate
Selection Committees for each project/contract listed in the Exhibit(s).
Upon completion of the evaluation process, GDOT will formally award the contract to the top-ranked
firm(s). Following the award, GDOT will initiate negotiations to finalize the terms and conditions of the
contract(s), including the scope, compensation, and fees to be paid.
If a satisfactory agreement cannot be reached with the highest-ranked firm, GDOT will formally
terminate negotiations and may initiate discussions with the next highest-ranked firm, continuing in
order of ranking until a mutual agreement is established and the contract is executed.
III. Selection Criteria and Weights
A. Phase I - The following criteria and weights will be utilized in the evaluation and scoring of Phase I
SOQs to determine which firms are shortlisted:
1. Project Manager, Key Team Leader(s), and Key Team Member - Experience and Qualifications
Weight: 30% - Evaluation will be based on the relevant experience, professional qualifications, and
technical expertise of the proposed Project Manager, Key Team Leader(s), and Key Team member
for the identified scope of work.
2. Additional Resources and Challenges Weight: 20% - This criterion considers the firm on its
Additional Resources and Approach to address scope challenges.
3. Prime Consultant Experience and Past Performance Weight: 10% - Past performance will be
assessed using the evaluation forms submitted by the firm and any relevant experience or project
knowledge held by members of the Selection Committee, particularly regarding similar or related
GDOT projects.
B. Phase II - The following criteria and weights will be utilized in the evaluation and scoring of the
shortlisted firms (finalists): Technical Approach.
1. Technical Approach Weight: 40% - This criterion evaluates the firm's proposed methodology,
understanding of the project requirements, approach to managing key tasks, anticipated
challenges, and strategies for delivering a successful project outcome.
2. Presentation/Interview GDOT reserves the right to request a presentation/interview on any
project/contract as determined in its best interests; however, this additional requirement shall
typically be reserved for the most complex projects.
IV. Instructions for Content and Preparation of Statement of Qualifications - Phase I
Response
The SOQs submittal must be submitted per the instructions provided below and be organized, categorized
using the same headings (in red), numbered and lettered exactly as outlined below, and responsive to all
requested information. For the sections in which page number limits are stated, each section with a stated
limit must begin on a new page and end on the last page allowed for the section. New sections shall not
begin on a page allowed for a previous section, if applicable. This will enable the Department to ensure
compliance with the page limitations.
Restrictions on Inclusion of GDOT Employees and Personnel Disclosure
4

Date Posted: 6/3/2026
Respondents may reference current Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) employees within the
Prime Consultant Experience and Past Performance sections of the SOQ (Sections E and F), including
within project descriptions, evaluation forms, and narratives, where applicable. Such references shall be
limited to the individual's role on the referenced project and shall not imply participation on the proposing
team or involvement in the current procurement.
Respondents shall not list, reference, or otherwise include any current GDOT employee as part of the
proposed team, including but not limited to resumes, organizational charts, narratives, or proposed team
roles. The inclusion of any current GDOT employee as part of the proposed team shall render the SOQ
non-responsive.
Respondents must also ensure that all individuals identified in the SOQ have been informed of, and have
agreed to, their inclusion on the proposed team. Respondents shall not list employees of other firms-
including potential sub-consultants or unaffiliated entities-without those individuals' knowledge and the
concurrence of their current employer.
To ensure transparency and avoid conflicts of interest, Respondents must clearly identify the current
employer of all individuals proposed in the SOQ, including the Project Manager, Key Team Leaders, Key
Team Members, all individuals shown on the organizational chart, and any individual referenced in the SOQ
narrative or resumes. Failure to comply with these requirements shall result in a determination of non-
responsiveness
Cover page - Each project/contract submittal must have a separate cover page for each copy of each
Phase I submittal and must indicate the response is for Phase I, and each project/contract
must list the RFQ#, RFQ Title, proposing firm's full legal name, and the specific project
contract being submitted on to include the Project Numbers, PI Numbers, County(ies), and
Description.
A. Contract Consideration Checklist
Each SOQ submittal must include one (1) Contract Consideration Checklist, similar to the example
provided on the last page of this RFQ. This checklist must identify all contracts for which the firm is
submitting SOQs under this solicitation. The inclusion of this single checklist will ensure that all
submitted SOQs are properly accounted for and placed into the correct evaluation package(s). In the
event of any discrepancy between the contract number(s) and the PI number(s) listed on a firm's SOQ
cover page, the PI number(s) will govern in determining which contract(s) the firm will be considered
for. Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) is essential to confirm the accuracy of contract
submittals. Firms are responsible for ensuring that all SOQs and associated documentation are
correctly completed and submitted in accordance with this requirement.
B. Addendum(s) - Signed cover page (Only) of any Addendum(s) issued.
C. Basic Company Information
The following general information is required for each submittal. This information will not be scored but
may be used by the Department to determine eligibility for selection. Firms must submit only the
requested information. Providing additional or unsolicited information may result in disqualification from
this solicitation.
1. Company Name: Provide the full legal name of the company.
2. Company Headquarters Address: Include the complete address of the company's headquarters.
3. Primary Contact Information: Provide the name, telephone number(s), and email address of the
individual who will serve as the main point of contact for this solicitation. This individual will receive
all communications from the Department.
4. Company Website: Include the company's website URL, if available.
5. Georgia Office Locations: Identify all office locations within the State of Georgia, including full
addresses.
6. Staffing in Georgia Offices: List the number of staff members employed at each Georgia office and
specify their disciplines.
7. Ownership Structure: Indicate the form of ownership (e.g., sole proprietorship, partnership,
corporation, limited liability company, or other structure). Include the state of residency or
5

Date Posted: 6/3/2026
incorporation and the number of years the firm has been in business.
This information is (Excluded from the page count).
D. Experience and Qualifications
1. Project Manager/Operations Lead - The following information must be provided for the proposed
Project Manager. This section is critical for evaluating qualifications and project relevance.
Resumes and supporting documentation must be clearly labeled and organized.
a. Current Employment
1) State the name of the firm where the Project Manager is currently employed.
2) Indicate the number of years the Project Manager has been with the firm.
3) Provide the total number of years of experience serving in the role of a Project Manager, to
distinguish between overall career length and actual leadership experience directly relevant to
the position.
b. Education: List relevant degrees or academic credentials.
c. Registration, if applicable and necessary for the position.
d. Relevant Project Management Experience: Provide a combination of narrative and listing of
specific experience managing on-call contracts or multiple projects of similar complexity, size,
scope, and function, and experience managing internal and sub-consultant resources to staff
projects on an as-needed basis.
e. GDOT-Specific Experience: Describe experience utilizing GDOT-specific procedures, policies,
and guidance such as the Plan Development Process (PDP), Design Policy Manual,
Environmental Procedures Manual, etc. If any listed projects did not follow GDOT processes,
clearly identify the alternative processes, manuals, or guidance used and provide a comparison
where appropriate.
This information is limited to two (2) pages maximum.
2. Key Team Leaders are defined as individuals who oversee project areas deemed critical to each
specific project (see Section 6 of the Project Description in Exhibit(s) below for the required Key Team
Leader roles per project). For each Key Team Leader identified, the following information must be
provided:
a. Current Employment and Experience:
1) State the name of the firm where the Key Team Leader is currently employed.
2) Indicate the number of years with the firm.
3) Provide the total years of experience serving in a leadership role within their discipline.
b. Education: List relevant degrees or academic credentials.
c. Registration: Provide details of applicable licenses or registrations required for the Key Team
Leader's area of responsibility (e.g., PE, RLA, PG), if necessary and applicable.
d. Relevant Resource Area Experience: Describe the Key Team Leader's relevant experience in their
specific resource area, highlighting involvement in projects of comparable complexity, size, scope,
and function.
e. Experience with GDOT-Specific Standards, detailing the Key Team Leader's use of GDOT-
specific processes, manuals, and guidance relevant to their discipline (e.g., PDP, Design Policy
Manual, Environmental Procedures Manual, etc.) For any projects that did not follow GDOT
processes, list the alternative processes, manuals, or standards used and explain their
comparability.
The information required for each Key Team Leader, as identified in Section 6 of each Project
Exhibit, is limited to one (1) page maximum per individual.
Respondents submitting more than one (1) page for any Key Team Leader will be subject to
disqualification. Additionally, respondents must provide only the Key Team Leaders specified in
the Project Exhibit(s). Submitting more Key Team Leaders than required will be considered non-
compliant and may result in disqualification, as it provides an unfair advantage over firms that
followed the stated requirements. Conversely, failure to submit all required Key Team Leaders will
render the proposal nonresponsive, and the respondent's team will be deemed unqualified for the
award. It is the respondent's responsibility to carefully review Section 6 of the relevant Exhibit(s)
6

Date Posted: 6/3/2026
and ensure strict compliance with both the number and content of Key Team Leader submittals.
3. Key Team Member is defined as an individual team member not included as the Project Manager or a
Key Team Leader, whose qualifications the Prime firm would like to highlight as essential in the delivery
of the proposed project/contract. For the Key Team Member identified, the following information must
be provided:
a. Current Employment and Experience:
1) State the name of the firm where the Key Team Member is currently employed.
2) Indicate the number of years with the firm.
3) Provide the total years of experience serving in a leadership role within their discipline.
b. Education: List relevant degrees or academic credentials.
c. Registration: Provide details of applicable licenses or registrations required for the Key Member
area of responsibility (e.g., PE, RLA, PG), if necessary and applicable.
d. Relevant Resource Area Experience: Describe the Key Team Member's relevant experience in
their specific resource area, highlighting involvement in projects of comparable complexity, size,
scope, and function.
e. Narrative discussing why the inclusion of the Key Team Member is important in the overall
delivery of the project/Contract.
f. Experience with GDOT-Specific Standards, Detail the Key Team Member's use of GDOT-
specific processes, manuals, and guidance relevant to their discipline (e.g., PDP, Design Policy
Manual, Environmental Procedures Manual, etc.) For any projects that did not follow GDOT
processes, list the alternative processes, manuals, or standards used and explain their
comparability.
The information is limited to one (1) page Maximum.
4. NOTE: Key Personnel Changes
If, after the RFQ submission deadline, a Project Manager or Key Team Leader listed in the SOQ is
no longer employed with the firm, a replacement may be submitted if the firm is shortlisted. The
replacement must be selected from within the same firm and included as part of the Phase II
Technical Approach submittal. All required information for the replacement personnel must be
provided, and the submittal must comply with the original page limitations. During the Phase II
evaluation meeting, the evaluation team will revisit and adjust the Phase I score to reflect the
experience and qualifications of the replacement personnel.
.
E. Additional Resources and Challenges
Overall Resources - Provide information regarding the overall resources dedicated to delivering the
specific project, including:
1. Organizational Chart - Provide an organizational chart that identifies the Project Manager, Prime
Consultant, Key Team Leaders, support personnel, and reporting structure. This chart is (Excluded
from the page count) and may be submitted in portrait or landscape orientation on (8.5" X 11") or
(11" x 17") paper, particularly when the Chart requires a large consultant team.
2. Primary Office - Identify and discuss the primary office responsible for managing the specific
project. Include the number and types of staff within that office and describe how this office will
benefit the project and promote efficiency. This information must be included on one (1) page,
combined with the Narrative on Additional Resource Areas and Abilities described in Section E.3.
3. Narrative on Additional Resource Areas and Ability - Provide a narrative describing any additional
resource areas important to the project. Discuss how the key areas will integrate and work together,
and include any pertinent information relevant to these areas. The narrative should also explain
how the team's organization-including the Project Manager, Key Team Leaders, and Key Team
Member - will support project delivery on schedule, given their current workload capacity. GDOT
acknowledges that some individuals may meet schedule requirements while managing heavier
workloads. Respondents may highlight the strengths and advantages of their team and explain how
the team's capabilities will help meet the proposed schedule outlined in the applicable Exhibit(s). If
no schedule is provided, discuss how the team's composition will support the project moving
forward as expeditiously as possible. Note: Respondents submitting more than one (1) page
combined for Sections E.2 and E.3 will be subject to disqualification.
7

Date Posted: 6/3/2026
4. Identify Additional Resources - Respondents are allowed one (1) page to provide information on
additional resources, outside of the Project Manager, Key Team Leaders, and Key Team Member,
providing a brief description of the resource and describing how the additional resources identified
will help address scope challenges. Respondents submitting more than one (1) page will be
subject to disqualification.
F. Prime Consultant Experience and Past Performance
Provide detailed descriptions of the Prime Consultant's past performance on task order-based, Indefinite
Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), or similar contract experience that demonstrates the firm's ability to manage
and deliver a variety of assignments that differ in scope, schedule, and complexity. Emphasize experience that
highlights the ability to manage multiple concurrent assignments, respond quickly to evolving priorities,
coordinate effectively across teams, and consistently meet quality, budget, and schedule requirements.
1. Similar Project Experience - Provide information on the prime consultant's experience and ability to
deliver effective services for projects of similar complexity, size, scope, and function, demonstrating
the firm's qualifications to perform services for GDOT. For each project listed, include the following
details:
a. Project: Provide the project name, GDOT PI number (if applicable), and project location.
b. Client: State the name of the client.
c. Date: Indicate the start and end dates of service. If the project is ongoing, please note that
accordingly.
d. Description: Provide a brief description of the overall project and clearly define the services your
firm performed.
e. Overall/Firm Budget: Include the overall project budget (total of PE, ROW, UTL, CST costs) and
the firm's total fees.
f. Client Contact: Provide current contact information for the client, including contact name(s),
telephone number(s), and e-mail address(es).
g. Team Involvement: Specify the involvement of the Project Manager and Key Team Leaders
identified in your SOQ on each project listed.
h. Similarity: Explain why this project is similar to the project(s) for which the firm is submitting a
proposal.
i. If applicable. If performance ratings are not available, provide a brief explanation.
2. Similar Project Experience Summary Write-up For the similar projects listed above, provide a
summary write-up detailing the firm's experience utilizing GDOT-specific processes, manuals, or
guidance, such as the Plan Development Process (PDP), Design Policy Manual, Environmental
Procedures Manual, and other applicable resources. If any projects did not follow GDOT processes,
clearly identify the alternative processes, manuals, or guidance that were used and explain their
comparability to GDOT standards.
This information is limited to four (4) pages maximum.
G. Prime Consultant Evaluation Forms - Respondents must submit a completed Project Evaluation
Form for each project referenced in the Similar Project Experience section. The form must be the most
current version of the Contract Management Information System (CMIS) Evaluation Form, printed
directly from CMIS for the respective project, and included in the SOQ submittal.
Evaluation Forms shall be submitted in the following order of preference: (1) CMIS Evaluation Form;
(2) Locally Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form, if applicable; and (3) Legacy Evaluation Form
when neither a CMIS nor LAP Evaluation Form is available for the referenced project.
If neither a CMIS nor a Locally Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form is available, respondents
shall complete and include the Legacy Evaluation Form provided with the RFQ on the Georgia
Procurement Registry.
For projects with non-Georgia clients, respondents may submit another agency's performance
evaluation form in place of the CMIS, LAP, or Legacy Evaluation Forms, provided the submitted form
includes comparable evaluation criteria (e.g., quality, timeliness, cost management, and
communication) and clearly identifies the project, the firm's role, and the evaluator. GDOT reserves the
8

Date Posted: 6/3/2026
right to request additional information or clarification if the submitted form does not provide sufficient
detail for evaluation.
Firms may submit project experience performed as a subconsultant when proposing as the Prime
Consultant; however, the firm's role and responsibilities on the project must be clearly defined in the
SOQ. The Prime Consultant shall not include or rely upon work performed by other firms or
subconsultants in which the Prime Consultant had no direct involvement.
Evaluation Forms shall be completed by individuals with direct knowledge and oversight of the
referenced project (e.g., Project Manager or responsible supervising official) and are independent of
the Evaluation Committee.
Note: GDOT will no longer issue reference requests via email or Microsoft Forms. It is the sole
responsibility of the respondent to obtain and include all required evaluation forms with the SOQ
submittal.
Failure to provide the required Evaluation Forms for each referenced project may result in a lower
evaluation rating for the Similar Project Experience factor.
The Project Evaluation Form assesses the consultant's performance on a specific project, focusing on
key performance indicators such as:
1. Project Quality
2. Timeliness
3. Cost Management
4. Communication
5. Overall, Client Satisfaction
These evaluations serve as a record of the consultant's effectiveness, professionalism, and ability to meet
project objectives and deadlines. The Department reserves the right to randomly validate any submitted project
evaluations by contacting the evaluators listed on the forms.
This information is excluded from the page count.
H. Area Class Prequalification Requirements:
1. Summary Table.
2. Notice of Professional Consultant Qualifications.
Respondents must complete a table indicating the firm (Prime Consultant or Subconsultant) that meets
each required GDOT Area Class for each project/ Exhibit. The applicable Area Classes are listed in
each Exhibit Section 4.
3. Definitions:
a. Prime Consultant: The firm submitting the Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) and the entity with
whom GDOT will contract.
b. Team: The Prime Consultant and any Subconsultants and/or joint venture partners included in
the SOQ. The Team (either the Prime Consultant or one or more of their Subconsultant team
members) must be prequalified by GDOT in all Area Classes required for each project/Exhibit.
4. Instructions for completing the Summary Table:
a. Place an "X" in the appropriate column to identify whether the Prime Consultant or a
Subconsultant holds each required Area Class.
b. Only include Area Classes that apply to the specific project.
c. Highlighted Area Classes required for the Prime Consultant, as specified in Exhibit Section 4.
d. Ensure that the Prequalification Expiration Date is valid and current at the time of submission.
e. Refer to an example of the required Area Class Summary Table below:
9

Date Posted: 6/3/2026
Failure to demonstrate valid prequalification for all required Area Classes will result in disqualification.
Primes and Subconsultants Certificate ) a ( 6 ) b ( 6 ) c ( 6 ) d ( 6 ) e ( 6 ) f ( 6 ) g ( 6 7 0 0 1
Expires 0
.1
0
.1
0
.1
0
.1
0
.1
0
.1
0
.1
.1 .1
Firm Name(s) (Prime) MM/DD/YYYY X X X X X
(Insert Sub Name) MM/DD/YYYY X
(Insert Sub Name) MM/DD/YYYY X X
(Insert Sub Name) MM/DD/YYYY X
5. The proposed project team must meet the Area Class requirements listed in the Exhibit(s) for each
project at the time SOQs are due. GDOT will conduct pre-screening of all potential shortlisted teams
to verify that the proposed team meets the required Area Class(es). If the required Area Class(es)
are not met, the team will be disqualified from further consideration.
6. If a team member's prequalification is scheduled to expire before the SOQ due date, the respondent
must provide documentation confirming that a renewal application has been submitted prior to the
SOQ due date. It is the consultant's responsibility to maintain current prequalification certifications
in accordance with the GDOT Prequalification Manual throughout the procurement process to
remain eligible for award.
7. If the highest-ranking firm does not meet the required Area Class(es), the Department reserves the
right to award the contract to the next highest-ranking firm that meets all Area Class requirements.
8. The Area Class Summary Table (Excluded from the page count) may be submitted in portrait or
landscape orientation on (8.5" X 11") or (11" x 17") paper, particularly when the Area Class Table
requires an extensive list of area classes or a large consultant team, plus one (1) page for each
team member's Notice of Professional Consultant Qualifications.
V. Instructions for Preparing Technical Approach - Phase II Response
The following information will only be requested of the shortlisted firms. The Selection Committee will
evaluate the shortlisted firms using the information provided as requested below (NOTE: Scores from Phase
I will be carried forward to Phase II):
The Phase II response must be submitted following the instructions provided below and must be
organized, categorized using the same headings (in red), numbered
and lettered
exactly as outlined below, and responsive to all requested information. For the sections
in which page number limits are stated, each section with a stated limit must begin on a new page and end
on the last page allowed for the section. It is not allowed to begin new sections on a page allowed for a
previous section, if applicable. This will enable the Department to ensure compliance with the page
limitations.
Phase II Cover page - Each submittal must have a separate cover page for each copy of each Phase II
submittal, and each must indicate the response is for Phase II, list the RFQ#, RFQ
Title, proposing firm's full legal name, and the specific project contract being
submitted, including the Project Numbers, PI Numbers, County(ies), and
Description.
A. Administrative Requirements
Each submittal will require a certification to allow the Department to analyze risks in determining if any
Firm should be ineligible for the award. The certification shall cover a wide variety of information. Any
firm that responds in any potentially concerning manner must provide additional information as directed
herein for consideration by GDOT to determine if the Firm is eligible for an award.
1. Certification Form - Complete the Certification Form and provide a notarized original within the
firm's Statement of Qualifications. This is to be submitted for Prime ONLY.
2. Georgia Security and Immigration Compliance Act Affidavit - Complete the form and provide a
notarized original within the firm's Statement of Qualifications. This is to be submitted for Prime
10