RFQ 484-062226 Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Services, District 4 - Tifton

Date Posted: 5/18/2026
Request for Qualifications
To Provide
Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Services,
District 4 - Tifton
RFQ 484-062226
Qualifications Due: June 22, 2026
Georgia Department of Transportation
One Georgia Center
600 West Peachtree Street, NW
Atlanta, Georgia 30308
v. 4-202 CEI

Date Posted: 5/18/2026
I. General Project Information
A. Overview
The Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) is soliciting Statements of Qualifications
(SOQs) from a qualified firm(s) to provide Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) services
listed in the Exhibit.
This Request for Qualifications (RFQ) seeks to identify potential providers for the Scope of Services
for the project/contract listed in the Exhibit. Firms that respond to this RFQ and are determined by
GDOT to be sufficiently qualified may be deemed eligible and invited to offer a technical approach
and/or possibly present and/or interview for these services. All respondents to this RFQ are subject
to the instructions communicated in this document and are cautioned to completely review the
entire RFQ and follow instructions carefully.
GDOT reserves the right to reject any or all Statements of Qualifications and Technical Approach,
and to waive technicalities and informalities at the discretion of GDOT.
B. Restriction of Communications
From the date of advertisement of this solicitation until the successful respondents are selected and
the award is officially announced, all firms are strictly prohibited from communicating in any way
regarding this solicitation or the associated scope of work with any GDOT staff, including the
Commissioner and GDOT Board Members. This restriction applies to all potential respondents and
will be strictly enforced.
The only exception to this restriction is for the purpose of obtaining a Consultant Evaluation
Form to support a project being included in the SOQ submittal.
All questions or requests for clarification regarding any aspect of this RFQ must be submitted in
writing via email to:
Alimah Igwe
aigwe@dot.ga.gov
Deadlines for the submission of questions are listed in the Schedule of Events section of this RFQ.
Method of Communication
All general communication regarding this solicitation, including updates, clarifications, and official
announcements, will be posted to the Georgia Procurement Registry (GPR) under this RFQ. It is
the responsibility of all interested firms to monitor the GPR regularly for such information.
GDOT reserves the right to communicate directly via electronic mail with the primary contact listed
in the submitted Statement of Qualifications (SOQ). Additional communications may be conducted
as specified elsewhere in this RFQ.
C. Contract Term and Type
GDOT anticipates one (1) On-Call Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity Contract to be awarded
to one (1) firm, for the project/contract identified. GDOT anticipates that the Payment Type may be
Lump Sum, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, Cost per Unit of Work, or Specific Rate of Compensation. As an
On-Call Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity contract, the Agreement will remain in effect for three
(3) years, with the option to extend the contract for up to a maximum of five (5) years.
2

Date Posted: 5/18/2026
D. Contract Amount
The On-Call, Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity contracts will have a minimum dollar amount of
twenty-five thousand ($25,000.00) and a maximum dollar amount of twenty-five million
($25,000,000.00).
E. Scope of Services
Under the terms of the resulting Agreements, the selected consultants will perform the anticipated
scope of work for the project outlined in the accompanying Exhibit referenced herein.
F. Schedule of Events
The following Schedule of Events represents GDOT's best estimate of the Schedule that will be
followed. All times indicated are prevailing times in Atlanta, Georgia. GDOT reserves the right to
adjust the Schedule as GDOT deems necessary.
PHASE I DATE TIME
a. GDOT issues a public advertisement for this RFQ. 5/18/2026 --------
b. Deadline for submission of written questions and requests for
5/27/2026 2:00 PM
clarification
c. Deadline for submission of SOQs
6/22/2026 2:00 PM
II. Selection Method
A. Phase I - Selection of Finalists
Based on the SOQs submitted in response to the projects/contracts listed in the Exhibit(s) below,
individual Selection Committee members will evaluate all firms individually based on the Phase I
selection criteria and weights listed in the solicitation. All firms will be discussed and evaluated by
the selection committee as a group and assigned a group rating for each of the Phase I evaluation
criteria and weights, resulting in a group score for Phase I, and the final rankings of the top
submittals will be determined. From the group scores of the top submittals, at least three (3) or
more of the most highly qualified consultants will be shortlisted for additional evaluation.
B. Finalist Notification
Each finalist firm shall be notified by email to participate in Phase II of the evaluation process and
informed of all due dates, additional details, and requirements beyond those provided in the
solicitation.
C. Phase II - Evaluation of Final Selection
Based on the Phase II response from the finalist firms, the selection committee members will
evaluate and discuss each finalist firm's submittal based on the Phase II selection criteria and
weights listed in the solicitation and assign a group rating resulting in a group score for Phase II.
3

Date Posted: 5/18/2026
D. Final Selection
The Final selection will be determined by carrying the selection committee group scores from Phase
I forward and adding them to the results for Phase II selection committee group scores, together
for a total score. The finalists will be ranked in order of preference. At least three firms will be
identified as the most highly qualified to perform the services listed in the Exhibit. Note that there
may be separate Selection Committees for each project/contract listed in the Exhibit.
Upon completion of the evaluation process, GDOT will formally award the contract to the top-ranked
firm(s). Following the award, GDOT will initiate negotiations to finalize the terms and conditions of
the contract(s), including the scope, compensation, and fees to be paid.
If a satisfactory agreement cannot be reached with the highest-ranked firm, GDOT will formally
terminate negotiations and may initiate discussions with the next highest-ranked firm, continuing in
order of ranking until a mutual agreement is established and the contract is executed.
III. Selection Criteria and Weights
A. Phase I - The following criteria and weights will be utilized in the evaluation and scoring of
Phase I SOQs to determine which firms are shortlisted:
1. Consultant Project Manager, Key Team Leader(s), and Key Team Member - Experience and
Qualifications Weight: 30% - Evaluation will be based on the relevant experience, professional
qualifications, and technical expertise of the proposed Project Manager, Key Team Leader(s),
and Key Team member for the identified scope of work.
2. Additional Resources and Challenges Weight: 20% - This criterion considers the firm on its
Additional Resources and Approach to address scope challenges.
3. Prime Consultant Experience and Past Performance Weight: 10% - Past performance will be
assessed using the evaluation forms submitted by the firm and any relevant experience or
project knowledge held by members of the Selection Committee, particularly regarding similar
or related GDOT projects.
B. Phase II - The following criteria and weights will be utilized in the evaluation and scoring of the
shortlisted firms (finalists): Technical Approach.
1. Technical Approach Weight: 40% - This criterion evaluates the firm's proposed methodology,
understanding of the project requirements, approach to managing key tasks, anticipated
challenges, and strategies for delivering a successful project outcome.
2. Presentation/Interview GDOT reserves the right to request a presentation/interview on any
project/contract as determined in its best interests; however, this additional requirement shall
typically be reserved for the most complex projects.
IV. Instructions for Content and Preparation of Statement of Qualifications - Phase
I Response
The SOQs submittal must be submitted per the instructions provided below and be organized,
categorized using the same headings (in red), numbered and lettered exactly as outlined below, and
responsive to all requested information. For the sections in which page number limits are stated, each
section with a stated limit must begin on a new page and end on the last page allowed for the section.
New sections shall not begin on a page allowed for a previous section, if applicable. This will enable
the Department to ensure compliance with the page limitations.
4

Date Posted: 5/18/2026
Restrictions on Inclusion of GDOT Employees and Personnel Disclosure
Respondents may reference current Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) employees within
the Prime Consultant Experience and Past Performance sections of the SOQ (Sections E and F),
including within project descriptions, evaluation forms, and narratives, where applicable. Such
references shall be limited to the individual's role on the referenced project and shall not imply
participation on the proposing team or involvement in the current procurement.
Respondents shall not list, reference, or otherwise include any current GDOT employee as part of the
proposed team, including but not limited to resumes, organizational charts, narratives, or proposed
team roles. The inclusion of any current GDOT employee as part of the proposed team shall render the
SOQ non-responsive.
Respondents must also ensure that all individuals identified in the SOQ have been informed of, and
have agreed to, their inclusion on the proposed team. Respondents shall not list employees of other
firms-including potential sub-consultants or unaffiliated entities-without those individuals' knowledge
and the concurrence of their current employer.
To ensure transparency and avoid conflicts of interest, Respondents must clearly identify the current
employer of all individuals proposed in the SOQ, including the Project Manager, Key Team Leaders,
Key Team Members, all individuals shown on the organizational chart, and any individual referenced
in the SOQ narrative or resumes. Failure to comply with these requirements shall result in a
determination of non-responsiveness
Cover page - Each project/contract submittal must have a separate cover page for each copy of each
Phase I submittal and must indicate the response is for Phase I, and each
project/contract must list the RFQ#, RFQ Title, proposing firm's full legal name, and
the specific project contract being submitted on to include the Project Numbers, PI
Numbers, County(ies), and Description.
A. Addendum(s) - Signed cover page (Only) of any Addendum(s) issued.
B. Basic Company Information
The following general information is required for each submittal. This information will not be scored
but may be used by the Department to determine eligibility for selection. Firms must submit only
the requested information. Providing additional or unsolicited information may result in
disqualification from this solicitation.
1. Company Name.
Provide the full legal name of the company.
2. Company Headquarters Address.
Include the complete address of the company's headquarters.
3. Primary Contact Information:
Provide the name, telephone number(s), and email address of the individual who will serve
as the main point of contact for this solicitation. This individual will receive all communications
from the Department.
4. Company Website.
Include the company's website URL, if available.
5. Georgia Office Locations.
Identify all office locations within the State of Georgia, including full addresses.
6. Staffing in Georgia Offices:
List the number of staff members employed at each Georgia office and specify their disciplines.
7. Ownership Structure:
Indicate the form of ownership (e.g., sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, limited
liability company, or other structure). Include the state of residency or incorporation and the
number of years the firm has been in business.
5

Date Posted: 5/18/2026
This information is (Excluded from the page count).
C. Experience and Qualifications
1. Consultant Project Manager - The following information must be provided for the proposed
Consultant Project Manager. This section is critical for evaluating qualifications and project
relevance. Resumes and supporting documentation must be clearly labeled and organized.
a. Current Employment.
1) State the name of the firm where the Consultant Project Manager is currently employed.
2) Indicate the number of years the Consultant Project Manager has been with the firm.
3) Provide the total number of years of experience serving in the role of a Consultant Project
Manager, to distinguish between overall career length and actual leadership experience
directly relevant to the position.
b. Education: List relevant degrees or academic credentials.
c. Registration, if applicable and necessary for the position.
d. Relevant construction engineering or inspection experience.
e. Relevant project management experience, including making day-to-day workflow decisions
for projects of similar complexity, size, scope, and function.
f. Relevant construction engineering and inspection-based training.
g. Relevant experience utilizing GDOT-specific processes, manuals, or guidance (Standard
Specifications, Construction Manual, Bridges Manual, Environmental Procedures Manual,
etc.).
This information is limited to two (2) pages maximum.
2. Key Team Leaders are defined as individuals who oversee project areas deemed critical to each
specific project (see Section 6 of the Project Description in Exhibit below for the required Key
Team Leader roles per project). For each Key Team Leader identified, the following information
must be provided:
a. Current Employment and Experience.
1) State the name of the firm where the Key Team Leader is currently employed.
2) Indicate the number of years with the firm.
3) Provide the total years of experience serving in a leadership role within their discipline, to
distinguish between overall career length and actual leadership experience directly
relevant to the position.
b. Education: List relevant degrees or academic credentials.
c. Registration: Provide details of applicable licenses or registrations required for the Key Team
Leader's area of responsibility (e.g., PE, RLA, PG), if necessary and applicable.
d. Relevant construction engineering and inspection, traffic control, and erosion control
experience on highway and bridge construction projects, and GDOT or other State Highway
Agency experience in the applicable resource area.
e. Relevant construction engineering and inspection-based training.
f. Relevant experience utilizing GDOT-specific processes, manuals, or guidance (Standard
Specifications, Construction Manual, Bridges Manual, Environmental Procedures Manual,
etc.), which are specific to the key team leader's area.
The information required for each Key Team Leader, as identified in Section 6 of each
Project Exhibit, is limited to one (1) page maximum per individual.
Respondents submitting more than one (1) page for any Key Team Leader will be subject to
disqualification. Additionally, respondents must provide only the Key Team Leaders specified in
the Project Exhibit(s). Submitting more Key Team Leaders than required will be considered non-
6

Date Posted: 5/18/2026
compliant and may result in disqualification, as it provides an unfair advantage over firms that
followed the stated requirements. Conversely, failure to submit all required Key Team Leaders
will render the proposal nonresponsive, and the respondent's team will be deemed unqualified
for the award. It is the respondent's responsibility to carefully review Section 6 of the relevant
Exhibit and ensure strict compliance with both the number and content of Key Team Leader
submittals.
3. Key Team Member is defined as an individual team member not included as the Project
Manager or a Key Team Leader, whose qualifications the Prime firm would like to highlight as
essential in the delivery of the proposed project/contract. For the Key Team Member identified,
the following information must be provided:
a. Current Employment and Experience.
1) State the name of the firm where the Key Team Member is currently employed.
2) Indicate the number of years with the firm.
3) Provide the total years of experience serving in a leadership role within their discipline, to
distinguish between overall career length and actual leadership experience directly
relevant to the position.
b. Education: List relevant degrees or academic credentials.
c. Registration: Provide details of applicable licenses or registrations required for the Key
Member area of responsibility (e.g., PE, RLA, PG), if necessary and applicable.
d. Relevant technical experience.
e. Relevant experience utilizing GDOT-specific processes, manuals, or guidance (PDP, Design
Policy, Environmental Procedures Manual, etc.), which are specific to the key resource
area.
f. Narrative discussing why the inclusion of the Key Team Member is important in the overall
delivery of the project/contract.
The information is limited to one (1) page Maximum.
4. NOTE: Key Personnel Changes
If, after the RFQ submission deadline, a Project Manager or Key Team Leader listed in the SOQ
is no longer employed with the firm, a replacement may be submitted if the firm is shortlisted.
The replacement must be selected from within the same firm and included as part of the Phase
II Technical Approach submittal. All required information for the replacement personnel must be
provided, and the submittal must comply with the original page limitations. During the Phase II
evaluation meeting, the evaluation team will revisit and adjust the Phase I score to reflect the
experience and qualifications of the replacement personnel.
D. Additional Resources and Challenges
Overall Resources - Provide information regarding the overall resources dedicated to delivering the
specific project, including:
1. Organizational Chart - Provide an organizational chart that identifies the Project Manager,
Prime Consultant, Key Team Leaders, support personnel, and reporting structure. This chart is
(Excluded from the page count) and may be submitted in portrait or landscape orientation on
(8.5" X 11") or (11" x 17") paper, particularly when the Chart requires a large consultant team.
2. Primary Office - Identify and discuss the primary office responsible for managing the specific
project. Include the number and types of staff within that office and describe how this office will
benefit the project and promote efficiency. This information must be included on one (1) page,
combined with the Narrative on Additional Resource Areas and Abilities described in Section
D.3.
3. Narrative on Additional Resource Areas and Ability - Respondents are to provide information
regarding additional resource areas identified as important to the project, to discuss how the
key areas will integrate and work together on the project, to discuss any information which is
7

Date Posted: 5/18/2026
pertinent to these areas, to provide a narrative regarding how the organization of the team,
including the Consultant Project Manager, Key Team Leaders, and Key Team Member can
deliver the project. Respondents may discuss the advantages of the team and the abilities of
the team members, which will assist the Department in achieving its performance targets.
Respondents submitting more than one (1) page combined for Sections D.2 and D.3 will be
subject to disqualification.
4. Identify Additional Resources - Respondents are allowed one (1) page to provide information
on additional resources, outside of the Consultant Project Manager, Key Team Leaders, and
Key Team Member, providing a brief description of the resource and describing how the
additional resources identified will help address Consultant Engineering and Inspection (CEI)
Services, traffic control, and erosion control challenges. Respondents submitting more than
one (1) page will be subject to disqualification.
E. Prime Consultant Experience and Past Performance
1. Similar Project Experience
Provide detailed descriptions of the Prime Consultant's past performance on task orders and
Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contracts that demonstrate the firm's ability to
manage and deliver assignments that differ in scope, schedule, and complexity. Emphasize
experience managing multiple concurrent task orders, responding rapidly to shifting priorities,
coordinating across multidisciplinary teams, and consistently meeting quality, budget, and
schedule requirements.
IDIQ/On-Call Master Contract Description
a. Identify the client's name, project locations, and service dates.
b. Describe the overall types of projects and services provided under the master contract.
c. Provide the client's current contact information, including contact name, title, telephone
number, and email address.
d. State the IDIQ maximum contract value.
e. Indicate the total value earned by the Prime Consultant under the master contract. If the
contract is still active, provide the amount earned to date and note that the contract is
ongoing.
f. Describe the services performed on a similar Project experience. Identify proposed SOQ key
Personnel (e.g., Consultant Project Manager, Key Team Leaders, and Key Team Member)
who participated in the similar project experience and specify how they supported the
contract listed. Highlight key outcomes, including notable deliverables, milestones, or
measurable impacts.
2. Similar Project Experience Summary Write-up - For the contracts listed above, provide an
evidence-based narrative explaining the firm's recruitment and retention approach for CEI staff,
how construction funds were managed, and how the firm moved, balanced, and reallocated
resources within the contract area to align with changing work plans. Include specific examples
and quantitative results where applicable.
This information is limited to four (4) pages maximum.
F. Prime Consultant Evaluation Forms - Respondents must submit a completed Project Evaluation
Form for each project referenced in the Similar Project Experience section. The form must be the
most current version of the Contract Management Information System (CMIS) Evaluation Form,
printed directly from CMIS for the respective project, and included in the SOQ submittal.
Evaluation Forms shall be submitted in the following order of preference: (1) CMIS Evaluation
Form; (2) Locally Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form, if applicable; and (3) Legacy
Evaluation Form when neither a CMIS nor LAP Evaluation Form is available for the referenced
project.
8

Date Posted: 5/18/2026
If neither a CMIS nor a Locally Administered Project (LAP) Evaluation Form is available,
respondents shall complete and include the Legacy Evaluation Form provided with the RFQ on the
Georgia Procurement Registry.
For projects with non-Georgia clients, respondents may submit another agency's performance
evaluation form in place of the CMIS, LAP, or Legacy Evaluation Forms, provided the submitted
form includes comparable evaluation criteria (e.g., quality, timeliness, cost management, and
communication) and clearly identifies the project, the firm's role, and the evaluator. GDOT reserves
the right to request additional information or clarification if the submitted form does not provide
sufficient detail for evaluation.
Firms may submit project experience performed as a subconsultant when proposing as the Prime
Consultant; however, the firm's role and responsibilities on the project must be clearly defined in
the SOQ. The Prime Consultant shall not include or rely upon work performed by other firms or
subconsultants in which the Prime Consultant had no direct involvement.
Evaluation Forms shall be completed by individuals with direct knowledge and oversight of the
referenced project (e.g., Project Manager or responsible supervising official) and are independent
of the Evaluation Committee.
Note: GDOT will no longer issue reference requests via email or Microsoft Forms. It is the sole
responsibility of the respondent to obtain and include all required evaluation forms with the SOQ
submittal.
Failure to provide the required Evaluation Forms for each referenced project may result in a lower
evaluation rating for the Similar Project Experience factor.
The Project Evaluation Form assesses the consultant's performance on a specific project, focusing
on key performance indicators such as:
1. Project Quality
2. Timeliness
3. Cost Management
4. Communication
5. Overall, Client Satisfaction
These evaluations serve as a record of the consultant's effectiveness, professionalism, and ability
to meet project objectives and deadlines. The Department reserves the right to randomly validate
any submitted project evaluations by contacting the evaluators listed on the forms.
This information is excluded from the page count.
G. Area Class Prequalification Requirements:
1. Summary Table.
2. Notice of Professional Consultant Qualifications.
Respondents must complete a table indicating the firm (Prime Consultant or Subconsultant) that
meets each required GDOT Area Class for each project/ Exhibit. The applicable Area Classes are
listed in each Exhibit Section 4.
3. Definitions:
a. Prime Consultant: The firm submitting the Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) and the entity with
whom GDOT will contract.
9

Date Posted: 5/18/2026
b. Team: The Prime Consultant and any Subconsultants and/or joint venture partners included in
the SOQ. The Team (either the Prime Consultant or one or more of their Subconsultant team
members) must be prequalified by GDOT in all Area Classes required for each project/Exhibit.
4. Instructions for completing the Summary Table:
a. Place an "X" in the appropriate column to identify whether the Prime Consultant or a
Subconsultant holds each required Area Class.
b. Only include Area Classes that apply to the specific project.
c. Highlight all Area Classes required for the Prime Consultant, as specified in Exhibit Section 4.
d. Ensure that the Prequalification Expiration Date is valid and current at the time of submission.
e. Refer to an example of the required Area Class Summary Table below:
Failure to demonstrate valid prequalification for all required Area Classes will result in
disqualification.
Primes and Subconsultants Certificate ) a ( 6 ) b ( 6 ) c ( 6 ) d ( 6 ) e ( 6 ) f ( 6 ) g ( 6 7 0 0 1
Expires 0
.1
0
.1
0
.1
0
.1
0
.1
0
.1
0
.1
.1 .1
Firm Name(s) (Prime) MM/DD/YYYY X X X X X
(Insert Sub Name) MM/DD/YYYY X
(Insert Sub Name) MM/DD/YYYY X X
(Insert Sub Name) MM/DD/YYYY X
5. The proposed project team must meet the Area Class requirements listed in the Exhibit( for each
project at the time SOQs are due. GDOT will conduct a pre-screening of all potential shortlisted
teams to verify that the proposed team meets the required Area Class(es). If the required Area
Class(es) are not met, the team will be disqualified from further consideration.
6. If a team member's prequalification is scheduled to expire before the SOQ due date, the
respondent must provide documentation confirming that a renewal application has been
submitted before the SOQ due date. It is the consultant's responsibility to maintain the
current prequalification certifications in accordance with the GDOT Prequalification Manual
throughout the procurement process to remain eligible for award.
7. If the highest-ranking firm does not meet the required Area Class(es), the Department reserves
the right to award the contract to the next highest-ranking firm that meets all Area Class
requirements.
8. The Area Class Summary Table (Excluded from the page count) may be submitted in portrait or
landscape orientation on (8.5" X 11") or (11" x 17") paper, particularly when the Area Class Table
requires an extensive list of area classes or a large consultant team.
9. Submit Notice of Professional Consultant Qualifications for the team members listed in the Area
Class Summary Table.
V. Instructions for Preparing Technical Approach - Phase II Response
The following information will only be requested of the shortlisted firms. The Selection Committee will
evaluate the shortlisted firms using the information provided as requested below (NOTE: Scores from
Phase I will be carried forward to Phase II):
The Phase II response must be submitted following the instructions provided below and must
be organized, categorized using the same headings (in red), numbered and lettered exactly as
outlined below, and responsive to all requested information. For the sections in which page number
limits are stated, each section with a stated limit must begin on a new page and end on the last page
allowed for the section. It is not allowed to begin new sections on a page allowed for a previous section,
10