REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
for As-Needed Third-Party Cost
Estimating, Constructability,
Scheduling and Contracting Advisory
Services
RFP No. 565-26-001
ADDENDA
Prospective bidders are responsible for reviewing any
published addenda regarding this bid at
ebmud.com/business-center
CONTACT
Alexa Groenke, Associate Civil Engineer
(510) 287-0231
alexa.groenke@ebmud.com
RESPONSE DUE
March 9, 2026
4:00 p.m. PST
SUBMIT ELECTRONICALLY TO*
Alexa Groenke, EBMUD
alexa.groenke@ebmud.com
*Hardcopy proposals will not be accepted
375 ELEVENTH STREET . OAKLAND . CA 94607-4240 . WWW.EBMUD.COM/BUSINESS-CENTER/
EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
RFP for As-Needed Third-Party Cost Estimating, Constructability,
Scheduling and Contracting Advisory Services
RFP No. 565-26-001
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. STATEMENT OF WORK ........................................................................................................... 3
A. SCOPE ................................................................................................................................ 3
B. PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS ............................................................................................. 5
C. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS .................................................................................................. 5
II. CALENDAR OF EVENTS ........................................................................................................... 8
III. DISTRICT PROCEDURES, TERMS, AND CONDITIONS ................................................................ 8
A. RFP ACCEPTANCE AND AWARD ......................................................................................... 8
B. EVALUATION CRITERIA/SELECTION COMMITTEE .............................................................. 9
C. PRICING ........................................................................................................................... 10
D. NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD AND PROTESTS............................................................... 12
E. INVOICING ....................................................................................................................... 13
F. TERMINATION OF TASK ORDER ....................................................................................... 14
IV. RFP RESPONSE SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION .......................................... 14
A. DISTRICT CONTACTS ........................................................................................................ 14
B. SUBMITTAL OF RFP RESPONSE ........................................................................................ 14
C. RESPONSE FORMAT ......................................................................................................... 15
ATTACHMENTS
EXHIBIT A – RFP RESPONSE PACKET
EXHIBIT B – INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
EXHIBIT C – CONSULTING AND PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT D – IRAN CONTRACTING ACT CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT E – ANTICIPATED EXAMPLE PROJECTS REQUIRING SERVICES
EXHIBIT F – MAP OF DISTRICT WATER SERVICE AREA
EXHIBIT G – ENGINEERING STANDARD PRACTICE (ESP) 020.3 – COST ESTIMATING FOR
CONSTRUCTION
As-Needed Third-Party Cost Estimating, Constructability,
Scheduling and Contracting Advisory Services
RFP No. 565-26-001
I. STATEMENT OF WORK
A. SCOPE
It is the intent of these specifications, terms, and conditions to describe as-needed
Engineering Design services being requested by the District.
East Bay Municipal Utility District (District) intends to award a 3-year contract (with 2
options to renew for one-year terms) to the selected Proposers that best meet the
District’s requirements. See below for details how specific work will be assigned via task
orders.
The purpose of this RFP is to develop a short list of pre-qualified respondents willing to
provide various engineering design services for water facilities on an as-needed basis.
EBMUD estimates the amount of engineering design services at approximately $1M per
year for term of 3 years, with 2 annual options to renew. The District anticipates
needing services for several larger/more complex task orders per year. Actual quantity
and frequency of requested services from any one consultant may vary. See Exhibit E for
examples of upcoming projects that we anticipate needing services for.
The East Bay Municipal Utility District is a publicly-owned agency that supplies drinking
water to 30 East Bay communities and treats wastewater generated by nine of these
communities.
As part of the drinking water system, EBMUD operates six water treatment plants
capable of filtering and processing more than 375 million gallons of water daily (MGD).
These water treatment plants are Upper San Leandro in Oakland, San Pablo in
Kensington, Sobrante in El Sobrante, and plants located in and named for Orinda,
Lafayette and Walnut Creek. In conjunction with these plants, the District operates and
maintains 4,200 miles of distribution pipeline, 123 pressure zones, 140 pumping plants,
177 reservoirs and other associated facilities integral to delivering quality water to its
customers.
The District’s Capital Improvement Program calls for new and upgraded water
infrastructure facilities to maintain quality standards, reliability, and to meet current
and future demands of our water distribution and treatment systems. The design of
these improvements is typically performed by District staff, or a combination of District
staff and consultants.
Additionally, the District maintains several administrative office facilities that are critical
to our day-to-day operations. As these facilities age, there is a need to upgrade certain
components of the buildings and facilities that may include plumbing, power/electrical,
HVAC, lighting, fire protection, security, elevator, treatment processes, electric vehicle
Page 3
As-Needed Third-Party Cost Estimating, Constructability,
Scheduling and Contracting Advisory Services
RFP No. 565-26-001
charging infrastructure, trenchless technology, and other complex or specialized
systems. The design of these upgrades is typically performed by specialized consultants.
This RFP solicitation includes these types of design services.
As part of the design process, the District may seek third-party review of design
drawings and specifications, cost estimating services, constructability review services,
and related engineering support for specific projects on an as-needed basis. Proposers
should have expertise in any of the identified categories listed in the Proposer
Experience section of the PROPOSER INFORMATION AND ACCEPTANCE form. The review
may include any of, or a combination of the numbered tasks below in Section I.C –
SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS below and as summarized here:
Facilities:
Trenchless Technology
Pumping Plants
Reservoirs/Tanks
Rate Control Stations
Office Buildings
EV Infrastructure
Areas:
Constructability and
Scheduling Review
Value Engineering
Cost Estimating
Training
Engineering discipline(s):
Civil Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering
Structural Engineering
Mechanical Engineering
Electrical Engineering
Instrumentation Engineering
Process Engineering
Facilities/Building Engineering
Other (indicate on proposal form)
Once a proposer has been short listed, the District may enter into direct negotiations
(e.g., telephonic confirmation of current availability, staffing, and specific project costs)
and award agreements for specific work based on the demonstrated qualifications to
the respondent most qualified for a particular assignment based upon project or
discipline-specific technical experts that possess skill sets beyond District staff’s
capabilities or availability to perform the work. The Consultant will be expected to
prepare a written response for each project-specific proposal (task order).
The response to each task order proposal request is expected to be completed within
fourteen (14) business days of request. The task order response shall include a brief
description of the firm’s approach to the specific requested scope and shall include
estimated costs (based on the quoted proposal billing rates, broken down into hours by
classification) and estimated schedule (based on Consultant’s resources and
commitments). If the schedule does not meet District’s needs, District may request a
task order proposal from another Consultant. If schedule is acceptable, District will issue
a written authorization to proceed.
Page 4
As-Needed Third-Party Cost Estimating, Constructability,
Scheduling and Contracting Advisory Services
RFP No. 565-26-001
Task orders will vary in scale and required expertise and may require a combination of
or all of the civil/structural/mechanical/electrical engineering disciplines. Work will be
distributed among the selected firms or teams based on review of assigned team
members qualifications and expertise relating to particular projects, the firm’s past
performance on District projects, and responsiveness, at the discretion of the District.
B. PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS
1. Proposer Minimum Qualifications
a. Proposer, Proposer’s principal, or Proposer’s staff shall have been
regularly engaged in the business of providing Cost Estimating,
Constructability Review, Value Engineering, Scheduling Review, and other
Engineering Design services for at least three (3) years in the specific
specialty(ies) indicated by the Proposer in the PROPOSER INFORMATION
AND ACCEPTANCE section in Exhibit A.
b. Proposer shall possess all permits, licenses, and professional credentials
necessary to perform services as specified under this RFP.
c. Proposer’s staff and project manager shall be available for on-call services.
The primary office locations of proposed project manager and key team
members shall be within 3 hours of the District’s service area (see Exhibit
F), and staff shall be able to travel to any site within this area. Proposers
shall be able to meet timelines as specified in C. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
below.
C. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
Typical task order requests may include any or some combination of the tasks described
below. The proposer shall address how they would approach a range of expected
engineering design services for water infrastructure and/or facilities projects. The RFP
response shall also indicate typical splits of work among different job classifications and
any details on use of subconsultants. Acceptable timelines for deliverables will vary
depending on the scope and scale of each task order; however, general expectations
have been outlined below.
Task 1 – Facility/Site Visits
The Consultant shall participate in a walking tour of the facility with District staff to
better understand the site conditions, space constraints and limitations involved; take
photos and measurements; and discuss the scope of the project, possible staging and
lay-down areas, concerns/needs of facility staff, and how on-going operations may
Page 5
This page summarizes the opportunity, including an overview and a preview of the attached documents.