REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL (RFP)
for Regulatory Compliance -
Environmental Workplace Health &
Safety System (EHS)
ADDENDA
Prospective bidders are responsible for reviewing any published
addenda regarding this bid at ebmud.com/business-center
CONTACT
Raymond Lee, Project Manager
EHSProject@EBMUD.com
RESPONSE DUE
January 23, 2026
4:00 p.m. PDT
SUBMIT ELECTRONICALLY TO*
Raymond Lee, EBMUD
EHSProject@EBMUD.com
*Hardcopy proposals will not be accepted
EAST BAY MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
RFP for Regulatory Compliance EHS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. STATEMENT OF WORK
A. SCOPE
B. PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS
C. BACKGROUND
D. SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
II. CALENDAR OF EVENTS
III. DISTRICT PROCEDURES, TERMS, AND CONDITIONS
A. RFP ACCEPTANCE AND AWARD
B. EVALUATION CRITERIA/SELECTION COMMITTEE
C. PRICING
D. NOTICE OF INTENT TO AWARD AND PROTESTS
E. INVOICING
IV. RFP RESPONSE SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS AND INFORMATION
A. DISTRICT CONTACTS
B. SUBMITTAL OF RFP RESPONSE
C. RESPONSE FORMAT
ATTACHMENTS
EXHIBIT A – RFP RESPONSE PACKET
EXHIBIT B – INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS
EXHIBIT C – IT SERVICES AGREEMENT
EXHIBIT D – IRAN CONTRACTING ACT CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT E – INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SECURITY INFORMATION TO BE EXCLUDED FROM PUBLIC
RECORDS ACT REQUESTS
EXHIBIT F – PRELIMINARY SECURITY INFORMATION GATHERING (PSIG)
REV 3/26/25
Regulatory Compliance EHS
I. STATEMENT OF WORK
A. SCOPE
It is the intent of this Request for Proposal to solicit proposals from firms qualified to provide
environmental and workplace health and safety information management systems and
implementation services for the East Bay Municipal Utility District (the District).
The District’s Regulatory Compliance Office (RCO), which is comprised of multiple work sections
including the Environmental Compliance Section (ECS) and the Workplace Health and Safety Section
(WHS), currently relies on outdated and unsupported data management systems—including Microsoft
Access, Excel, and various physical and digital files—to track critical Environmental, Health and Safety
(EHS) information. These tools are inefficient, difficult to scale, and increasingly unsustainable.
Microsoft Access, in particular, is no longer supported and is declining in industry use, raising serious
concerns about long-term accessibility and business continuity. Only a limited number of staff are
familiar with the existing systems; if they become unavailable, there is no institutional support or
backup, placing the District at risk of non-compliance. Many of the reports generated from this data
are legally required and time-sensitive; failure to meet these deadlines could result in regulatory
penalties.
The data being managed includes, but is not limited to, hazardous waste manifesting and reporting,
industrial hygiene data, worksite audits, injury tracking, and leading indicators used to proactively
identify and mitigate regulatory risks. Much of this data is spatial in nature, and in some cases, it is also
temporal or tied to employee-specific or task-based exposure and medical histories, which adds
further complexity. The current systems lack the ability to handle this depth and diversity of data. The
District is seeking a modern, modular Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platform that would allow for
centralized storage, facilitate statistical analysis, and support more informed, data-driven decision-
making. Such a system should, ultimately, save time, improve compliance, and reduce costs for the
District.
A modern, centralized system should:
Streamline workflows by allowing staff to access the same real-time data from anywhere,
eliminating bottlenecks caused by siloed Access and Excel databases and locally stored files.
Improves data searchability and reference by allowing users to quickly locate manifests by
generator site, waste stream, transporter, date, or EPA ID number—something that is slow and
cumbersome in Access.
Facilitates regulatory reporting and internal audits with automated generation of manifests,
summaries, and reports that are formatted for DTSC, EPA, or internal review, eliminating time-
consuming manual formatting and cross-checking.
Enables trend analysis and tracking across time and locations, helping staff identify waste
reduction opportunities, recurring compliance issues, or transporter inconsistencies.
Additional scope of work details may be found in the Supplemental A document.
Page 3
Regulatory Compliance EHS
East Bay Municipal Utility District (District) intends to award a multi-year contract, with several one (1)
year optional terms, to the Proposer who best meets the District’s requirements.
B. PROPOSER QUALIFICATIONS
1. Proposer, Proposer’s principal, or Proposer’s staff shall have been regularly engaged in
the business of providing EHS software solutions and implementation services for at
least 5 years.
2. Proposer shall be a certified or authorized manufacturer, dealer, or provider.
3. Proposer shall possess all permits, licenses, and professional credentials necessary to
perform services as specified under this RFP.
C. FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Functional requirements are documented in Supplemental Document A.
2. Wherever your system meets District requirements, specify whether the feature
is an out-of-the-box feature (no customization required) or one that requires
customization by the vendor or District.
D. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
1. Technical requirements are documented in Supplemental Document A.
2. Wherever your system meets District requirements, specify whether the feature
is an out-of-the-box feature (no customization required) or one that requires
customization by the vendor or District.
II. CALENDAR OF EVENTS
EVENT
Contact
Email Address
DATE/LOCATION
Raymond Lee
EHSProject@EBMUD.com
Pre-Submittal Meeting
MANDATORY/OPTIONAL
Site Tour
RFP Submittal Electronic
Mail
Due Date for Questions and
Clarifications
There is no Pre-Submittal Meeting
There is no Site Tour
EHSProject@EBMUD.com
January 7, 2026, 4:00 PM (local time)
Page 4
Regulatory Compliance EHS
Due Date for Response to
Questions/Clarifications
RFP Submittal Due Date &
Time
Short-List Interviews and
Demonstrations
January 12, 2026
January 23, 2026, no later than 4:00 PM (local time)
TBD
Note: All dates are subject to change by District.
Proposers are responsible for reviewing https://www.ebmud.com/business-center/requests-
proposal-rfps/ for any published addenda. Hard copies of addenda will not be mailed out.
III. DISTRICT PROCEDURES, TERMS, AND CONDITIONS
A. RFP ACCEPTANCE AND AWARD
1. RFP responses, short-list interviews, and demonstrations will be evaluated by the
Selection Committee and will be scored and ranked in accordance with the RFP section
entitled “Evaluation Criteria/Selection Committee.”
2. The Selection Committee will recommend award to the Proposer who, in its opinion, has
submitted the RFP response that best serves the overall interests of the District. Award
may not necessarily be made to the Proposer with the lowest overall cost.
3. The District reserves the right to award to a single or to multiple General or Professional
Service Providers, dependent upon what is in the best interest of the District.
4. The District has the right to decline to award this contract or any part of it for any
reason.
5. Any specifications, terms, or conditions issued by the District, or those included in the
Proposer’s submission, in relation to this RFP, may be incorporated into any purchase
order or contract that may be awarded as a result of this RFP.
6. Award of contract. The District reserves the right to reject any or all proposals, to accept
one part of a proposal and reject the other, unless the proposer stipulates to the
contrary, and to waive minor technical defects and administrative errors, as the interest
of the District may require. Award will be made, or proposals rejected by the District as
soon as possible after proposals have been opened.
B. EVALUATION CRITERIA/SELECTION COMMITTEE
All proposals will be evaluated by a Selection Committee. The Selection Committee may be
composed of District staff and other parties that have expertise or experience in this type of
procurement. The Selection Committee will select a Proposer in accordance with the evaluation
criteria set forth in this RFP. The evaluation of the RFP responses shall be within the sole
judgment and discretion of the Selection Committee.
Page 5
This page summarizes the opportunity, including an overview and a preview of the attached documents.