Q&A Addendum #1
Connections to Mainstream Benefits Programming RFP (#52383)
Q1. Expected reach: How many unique individuals do you anticipate being served through
this grant program? Even a loose estimate or range would be helpful.
A1. In past contracts, the number of individuals served was measured by the number of completed
SSI/SSDI applications, and the deliverable for number of completed applications (for SSI/SSDI
benefits only) per year was 25. However, rather than prescribing exact expectations, we encourage
respondents to outline what they believe is realistic and achievable, based on their experience
delivering similar work.
Q2. SSI/SSDI applications: Within that total, approximately how many individuals would
you expect to complete SSI or SSDI applications through the program?
A2. Eligible models may include, but are not limited to, SSI/SSDI application support. If the
program you propose involves helping people to apply for SSI/SSDI benefits only, then your
expected reach will likely be the same as the number of individuals who complete SSI/SSDI
applications through the program (see A1). In past contracts the deliverable for number of
completed applications (for SSI/SSDI benefits only) per year was 25. However, rather than
prescribing exact expectations, we encourage respondents to outline what they believe is realistic and
achievable, based on their experience delivering similar work.
Q3. Benefits Specialist position: Does the Benefits Specialist need to be a new hire, or could
this role be filled by an existing staff member?
A3. No, the Benefit Specialist staff or equivalent role does not need to be a new hire. Current staff
are able to serve in this role provided the City’s support does not supplant other existing funding.
Q4. Staffing structure: Would it be acceptable for the work to be split between two
employees, as long as the total level of effort equals 1.0 FTE?
A4. Yes, that is permissible. Proposals should describe the staffing plan and how personnel
time/effort will be tracked and cost allocated for the project.
Q5. Coordination meetings: In Task 2 (Implementation), the RFP notes that grantees
should “convene regular coordination meetings with key partners and stakeholders.” Could
you provide guidance on what frequency the City would consider “regular” meetings?
A5. Rather than prescribing exact expectations, we encourage respondents to outline what they
believe is realistic and achievable, based on their experience delivering similar work.