NOLA Public School
Procurement Department
2401 Westbend Parkway, Suite 5076,
New Orleans, LA 70114
Paul A. Lucius, Executive Director of Procurement
March 31, 2026
Addendum No. 1
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL NO. 26-0093
STEM PROGRAM PROVIDER SERVICES
This Addendum and Clarification item forms a part of the RFP Documents and modifies the original
RFP Documents issued March 12, 2026. Acknowledge receipt of this Addendum on the Addendum
Form of the Request for Proposal. Failure to do so may subject proposal to disqualification.
This Addendum consists of 1 Page(s).
CLARIFICATION:
1. Question : Does the RFP intend to award a single vendor or multiple vendors to satisfy the
Scope of Services?
Answer : The RFP is intended to be awarded to a single vendor capable of providing services
across all four listed sites. NOLA Public Schools intends to award this contract to one vendor
to fulfill the complete scope of services
2. Question : Is it acceptable to bid for Fall/Spring In-Class Sessions and Spring Mini-STEM Fest
if we are unsure whether we can provide services on the timeline required for Summer?
Answer:. The intention is to engage a single vendor to provide comprehensive support services
across all participating schools in need. If your organization is awarded the contract, you will
be required to collaborate directly with each school to develop and finalize a clear, detailed
schedule of services. This schedule should reflect the specific needs and requests of each
individual school and ensure timely, coordinated delivery of services throughout the contract
period.
3. Question : Would curriculum aligned to LSS more at the middle school level be acceptable for Travis
Hill NOLA?
Answer: The students currently served at Travis Hill are all at the high school level; therefore,
the curriculum should be designed to reflect high school–appropriate content and rigor. While
Travis Hill is equipped to accommodate middle school students, there are no middle school
students enrolled on the campus at this time.
RFP 26-0093 Stem Program Provider Services
Addendum No.1
4. Question : What is the desired timeframe for delivering the Summer STEM sessions?
Answer: Most summer sessions will commence at the conclusion of the 2025–2026 academic
year, with programming scheduled to begin in early June 2026.
5. Question : How will the fifteen (15) one-hour Fall/Spring sessions per school be scheduled? For
example, could they occur in quarterly rotations throughout the school year, or could we visit 2
schools in 15-week sessions? How flexible is this schedule or what does this schedule look like?
Answer : The scheduling of services will be determined by each individual school. Please be
mindful of school-specific factors, including testing schedules, holidays, and other on-campus
activities throughout the academic year. If your organization has the capacity to effectively
support multiple schools on the same calendar day without compromising the quality of
services, please do so. All questions or concerns regarding scheduling must be directed to the
respective school and may only be addressed upon contract award to your organization.
6. Question : Does the Spring Mini-STEM Fest take place on 1 day at 1 location for all 4 sites? Could they
occur on separate days per school?
Answer : The scheduling of services will be determined by each individual school. If your
organization has the capacity to effectively support multiple schools on the same calendar day
without compromising the quality of services, please do so. All questions or concerns regarding
scheduling must be directed to the respective school and may only be addressed upon contract
award to your organization.
7. Question : What are the anticipated date(s) of the Spring Mini-STEM Fest?
Answer : January 2027, the scheduling of services will be determined by each individual
school. Please be mindful of school-specific factors, including testing schedules, holidays, and
other on-campus activities throughout the academic year.
8. Question : Is there a min/max instructor to student ratio for the Scope of Services?
Answer : Class size will be determined based on the capacity of each classroom, with a
preferred student-to-instructor ratio of 15:1. The teacher of record will be present to support
classroom management only and will not be responsible for delivering instruction.
9. Question : If awarded and contracted, what does the District envision for expanding this partnership to
other LEA schools?
Answer:. If awarded this contract, your organization will provide services to the LEA schools
currently supported by our network
RFP 26-0093 Stem Program Provider Services
Addendum No.1
1. The Leah Chase School
2. Mary McLeod Bethune Charter School
3. Benjamin Franklin Charter Schools (Elementary & Middle)
4. Travis Hill NOLA
10. Question : May the District share which vendors it has utilized in the past for these services?
Answer: StemNola.
11. Question : Can you define in more detail each of the A-G critiera in 6.0?
Answer: Clarification of Evaluation Criteria (Section 6.0, A–G)
The evaluation criteria are designed to assess a vendor’s ability to fully deliver the scope of
work with quality, consistency, and measurable impact. Below are additional details for each
criterion:
A. Organizational Capacity & Infrastructure (20 points)
This criterion evaluates your organization’s ability to successfully operate across multiple
school sites simultaneously.
Reviewers will look for:
A clear and scalable staffing structure
Demonstrated experience managing multi-site implementation
Defined staffing ratios and supervision systems
Contingency plans to prevent service disruption
Operational readiness to serve a juvenile justice setting (Travis Hill)
Overall organizational stability and infrastructure
B. Program Design & Louisiana Standards Alignment (15 points)
This criterion evaluates the quality, rigor, and alignment of your STEM programming.
Reviewers will look for:
Explicit alignment to Louisiana State Standards
A clear instructional framework or STEM model
Standards crosswalks tied to sessions/activities
Developmentally appropriate design across grade levels
Evidence that sessions reinforce grade-level instructional priorities
C. Implementation Model & Staffing Approach (15 points)
This criterion evaluates how clearly and effectively your program will be executed
.
Reviewers will look for:
RFP 26-0093 Stem Program Provider Services
Addendum No.1
A true vendor-led delivery model (no reliance on school staff)
Defined staffing structure and roles
Strong onboarding and training systems
Supervision and quality assurance processes
A realistic and detailed implementation plan (including 30-60-90-day plan and calendar)
Clear communication systems with schools and the district
D. Robust Data System & Measurable Outcomes (15 points)
This criterion evaluates your ability to provide meaningful, quantitative evidence of impact.
Reviewers will look for:
Standards-aligned performance metrics
Student outcome tracking (not just participation)
Pre/post or skill-based measurement where applicable
Attendance and participation tracking
Clear reporting cadence (mid-cycle and end-of-cycle)
Sample reports or dashboards that are usable by school and district leadership
Note: Qualitative data alone is not sufficient.
E. Equity, Differentiation & Special Population Support (15 points)
This criterion evaluates your ability to meet the needs of diverse learners.
Reviewers will look for:
A clear differentiation plan
Strategies to support:
English Learners
Students with Disabilities
Students with behavioral needs
Below-grade-level learners
Advanced learners
Trauma-informed practices, particularly for Travis Hill
Flexibility to adapt to site-specific needs and enrollment variability
F. Cost of Services (10 points)
This criterion evaluates the overall cost proposal.
Consideration includes:
Cost reasonableness relative to the scope of work
Clarity and transparency of pricing
RFP 26-0093 Stem Program Provider Services
Addendum No.1
Any cost efficiencies or value-added components
This section is scored by the Procurement Department. The lowest cost receives the highest
score. Please refer to cost section of RFP to review formula.
G. Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Participation (15 points)
This criterion evaluates alignment with the DBE goal of 35%.
Consideration includes:
Vendor’s DBE status or partnerships
Commitment to meeting or exceeding participation goals
This section is also scored by the Procurement Department.
12. Question : Can you please define c. Sample Work that we may be able to provide in the Appendices?
Answer: “Sample Work” refers to the required sample deliverables outlined in the RFP under
the Required Sample Deliverables Summary section. These materials are intended to provide
concrete evidence of your organization’s capability and should reflect actual or representative
work.
Vendors should include the following in the Appendices:
Sample Standards Crosswalk Demonstrates alignment between your STEM activities and
Louisiana State Standards.
Sample Lesson Description Illustrates what a typical session looks like, including structure,
objectives, and student engagement.
Sample Dashboard or Impact Report Shows how you track and report student outcomes and
program effectiveness.
30-60-90 Day Implementation Plan Outlines how services will be launched and stabilized
across sites.
30-60-90 Sample Multi-Site Implementation Calendar Demonstrates your ability to coordinate
across multiple schools.
30-60-90 Sample Differentiation Plan Shows how instruction is adapted for diverse learners.
End of Addendum No.1
RFP 26-0093 Stem Program Provider Services
Addendum No.1
This page summarizes the opportunity, including an overview and a preview of the attached documents.