EVALUATOR NAME(S) AND PROFESSIONAL TITLE(S)
Name
Desmond Stewart
Jerry Howard
Angela Eley
Pavan Kumar
Tim Levy
Position
Interim CIO
User Services Manager
Project Manager
Network Engineer
Technical Director
Entity
Alcorn State University
Alcorn State University
Alcorn State University
Alcorn State University
Alcorn State University
AWARDED VENDOR REPORT
Alcorn State University’s (ASU) Office of Purchasing issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) to secure a
vendor to provide ASU Outdoor Wi-Fi. On June 10th the committee completed the evaluation of
proposals submitted for RFP No: 5540 Alcorn State University AV Classroom Phase II Project. The
following potential vendors submitted proposals for evaluation:
• Implemented Technologies
Open Edge
• Metrix Solutions
Howard Technologies
• Building & Development Technologies
• The award recommendation decision is based on information provided in each proposal.
The information below supports our decision on this recommendation. Our comments on
the strengths and weaknesses were expounded upon in individual rubrics. After thorough
evaluation and great consideration, we recommend that Building & Development
Technologies be awarded the contract for the Alcorn State Outdoor WiFi Project RFP
Number 5540.
AWARDED VENDOR
• Vendor Building & Development Technologies
Total Score 98
• All items were covered to meet ASU requirements within RFP 5540.
• Clear and concise in vendor’s ability to adequately perform the scope of work.
• Resume included the background, past work experience and references to assure that they
would be in line with what is to be expected to execute the duties of the contracted job.
• Best cost to meet requirements within RFP 5540.
Vendor Name: Metrix Solutions
Total Score 93
• All items were covered to meet ASU requirements within RFP 5540.
• Clear and concise in vendor’s ability to adequately perform the scope of work.
• Resume included the background, past work experience and references to assure that they
would be in line with what is to be expected to execute the duties of the contracted job.
• Cost was the major difference with the winning bid.
Vendor Name: Howard Technologies
Total Score 92
• All items were covered to meet ASU requirements within RFP 5540.
• Clear and concise in vendor’s ability to adequately perform the scope of work.
• Resume included the background, past work experience and references to assure that they
would be in line with what is to be expected to execute the duties of the contracted job.
• Cost was the major difference with the winning bid.
Vendor Name: Open Edge Communications
Total Score 73
• All items were covered to meet ASU requirements within RFP 5540.
• Clear and concise in vendor’s ability to adequately perform the scope of work.
• Resume included the background, past work experience and references to assure that they
would be in line with what is to be expected to execute the duties of the contracted job.
• Cost far exceeded other vendors’ bids.
Vendor Name: Implemented Technologies
Total Score 73
• All items were covered to meet ASU requirements within RFP 5540.
• Clear and concise in vendor’s ability to adequately perform the scope of work.
• Resume included the background, past work experience and references to assure that they
would be in line with what is to be expected to execute the duties of the contracted job.
• Cost far exceeded other vendors’ bids.
RFP 5540 Tallied
Scorecard
Possible
Points
Vendor 1
Vendor 2
Vendor 3
Vendor 4 Vendor 5
100
Building &
Metrix Solutions Howard
Open Implemented
Development
Technologies Edge
Technologies
Technologies
Maximum Possible 100
98
Points
93
92
73
73