Deloitte LLP
1230 Peachtree St. NE, Suite 3100
Atlanta, GA 30309 USA
Tel: +1 404 631 2774
www.deloitte.com
June 13, 2025
Via Email and Certified Mail
Kim White
ITS Public Records Officer
Mississippi Department of Information Technology Services
3771 Eastwood Drive
Jackson, MS 39211-6381
kim.white@its.ms.gov
Re: Notice of Intent to File Petition for Protective Order Regarding Request for
Records on ITS Project File Number 4635
Dear Ms. White:
Deloitte Consulting LLP (“Deloitte”) has received the June 4, 2025, Third Party
Notification Memorandum from the Mississippi Department of Information Technology Services
(“ITS”). This memorandum notified Deloitte that a third party, Conduent, submitted a public
records request regarding ITS Request for Proposal No. 4635 (the “RFP”), Integrated Disease
Surveillance Platform for the Mississippi State Department of Health (the “Platform”).1 Deloitte
was awarded the contract for this Platform on May 14, 2025 (the “Contract”).
In its public records request, Conduent seeks all bidders’ technical proposals; the
evaluation forms for these technical proposals; references; all bidders’ cost proposals, including
their best and final offers; the evaluation forms for these cost proposals; and the awardee Contract
and any Contract amendments.
In accordance with Miss. Code Ann. § 25-61-9, Deloitte hereby gives notice to ITS, with
a copy to Conduent (as the records requestor), of its intent to seek a protective order from the
Chancery Court of Hinds County, Mississippi, to prevent the disclosure of Deloitte’s confidential
and proprietary information and trade secrets contained in its RFP response and related
submissions to ITS.
This protective order is necessary as Deloitte’s proposal responding to the RFP contains
Deloitte’s trade secrets, confidential commercial, financial information, personal identifying
information, and system security information which are exempt from disclosure under Miss. Code
Ann. §§ 25-61-9(1)(a) and 79-23-1. Specifically, this information includes, among other things,
Deloitte’s technical approach and business plans; the company’s proposed project staffing plans;
1 ITS indicated that the agency received delivery confirmation of this notice on June 9, 2025.
1
personal information about key Deloitte employees proposed for the project; detailed cost and
pricing data and methodology; non-public information regarding other Deloitte customers’
projects and services; performance history; and internal Deloitte policies and procedures. The
public disclosure of this information would significantly damage Deloitte’s competitive position
and would also substantially interfere with Deloitte’s ongoing business operations and its
negotiations with both existing and potential customers. Moreover, given the confidentiality
considerations regarding the sensitive medical and health data that will be maintained on the
Platform, the public disclosure of any information regarding Deloitte’s proposed data security
methodology and practices could also cause harm to the State and its citizens.2
Pursuant to the ITS Public Records Policy, Deloitte submits this notice and statement of
its reasons for seeking a protective order at least 14 days before Deloitte intends to file its petition
for the protective order. Deloitte will submit its petition within the 21-day statutory window. See
Miss. Code Ann. § 21-61-9(1)(a). However, if the parties wish to discuss appropriate redacts and
withholdings to avoid such litigation, Deloitte is willing to meet and confer.
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Should you have any questions
regarding this notice, please contact me at acarlucci@deloitte.com or Brett W. Johnson, Deloitte’s
outside counsel, at bwjohnson@swlaw.com.
Very truly yours,
Deloitte Consulting LLP
Copy to:
Ana Beatriz Quezada J.
Conduent
100 Campus Drive, Ste 200 E
Florham Park, NJ 07932
ana.quezada@conduent.com
foia.requests@conduent.com
Brett Johnson, Snell & Wilmer LLP
bwjohnson@swlaw.com
Amy Carlucci, Associate General Counsel,
Deloitte LLP
2 Conduent also seeks the production of the Contract and any Contract amendments. Deloitte
understands that Mississippi law excludes certain contractual terms in state agency contracts from
being treated as confidential information. See Miss. Code Ann. § 25-61-9(7). However, this
provision does not apply to any portions of a contract that are marked as confidential, which may
be treated as trade secrets or confidential commercial or financial information. Therefore, to the
extent the future Contract includes any such confidential information, Deloitte intends to seek a
protective order to prevent the public disclosure of that information as well.
2